<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The White Paper Outline Buffet: The Innovation White Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ventajamarketing.com/writingblog/2010/07/the-white-paper-outline-buffet-the-innovation-white-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ventajamarketing.com/writingblog/2010/07/the-white-paper-outline-buffet-the-innovation-white-paper/</link>
	<description>For Marketing Managers Who Want More from Their Writers and Their Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John White</title>
		<link>http://ventajamarketing.com/writingblog/2010/07/the-white-paper-outline-buffet-the-innovation-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>John White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventajamarketing.com/writingblog/?p=1174#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Mark: Hooking readers back to a landing page with more resources is a good idea, but that is still in the rubric of &quot;For More Information.&quot; I advocate a call to action that is more like &quot;How to Follow Us,&quot; because that&#039;s where audience-building is headed. See the difference?

Glad you&#039;re enjoying the series of white paper outlines. I have in mind wrapping an ebook around them eventually.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Hooking readers back to a landing page with more resources is a good idea, but that is still in the rubric of &#8220;For More Information.&#8221; I advocate a call to action that is more like &#8220;How to Follow Us,&#8221; because that&#8217;s where audience-building is headed. See the difference?</p>
<p>Glad you&#8217;re enjoying the series of white paper outlines. I have in mind wrapping an ebook around them eventually.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McClure</title>
		<link>http://ventajamarketing.com/writingblog/2010/07/the-white-paper-outline-buffet-the-innovation-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventajamarketing.com/writingblog/?p=1174#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

I&#039;m enjoying this series of white paper tips and will have to print these out for ref... unless you&#039;ve got plans to parcel them into your own paper?

One question comes to mind from this sentence in your post:

&quot;In the pure sense of a white paper, they should refrain from naming their products, using the paper instead to build their own authority quietly.&quot;

You mentioned the client&#039;s urge/need to have their widget/solution in the piece and gave a reasonable approach for meeting that desire.

What do you think of having the white paper reference a landing page where other relevant info goodies await, including a free (but reg-required) webinar all about their specific products/solutions to the problems/issues raised in the white paper?

When I was in the corp world I&#039;d no problems accepting a tech soft-sell from a product/service vendor on a webinar. 
That&#039;s because Account Reps had already seeded the expectation that we&#039;d learn much more about vendor A&#039;s solutions by attending.
 
And, for the most part, we did.
Can&#039;t the white paper play a similar but automated &#039;silent sales partner&#039; role. One that mimics what the human does when pressing the flesh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m enjoying this series of white paper tips and will have to print these out for ref&#8230; unless you&#8217;ve got plans to parcel them into your own paper?</p>
<p>One question comes to mind from this sentence in your post:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the pure sense of a white paper, they should refrain from naming their products, using the paper instead to build their own authority quietly.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mentioned the client&#8217;s urge/need to have their widget/solution in the piece and gave a reasonable approach for meeting that desire.</p>
<p>What do you think of having the white paper reference a landing page where other relevant info goodies await, including a free (but reg-required) webinar all about their specific products/solutions to the problems/issues raised in the white paper?</p>
<p>When I was in the corp world I&#8217;d no problems accepting a tech soft-sell from a product/service vendor on a webinar.<br />
That&#8217;s because Account Reps had already seeded the expectation that we&#8217;d learn much more about vendor A&#8217;s solutions by attending.</p>
<p>And, for the most part, we did.<br />
Can&#8217;t the white paper play a similar but automated &#8216;silent sales partner&#8217; role. One that mimics what the human does when pressing the flesh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

